Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of Central Asian studies. The natural emancipation process of the five States of the region is often not accompanied by, so to speak, the emancipation of the studies of those countries and their relations on a regional scale. In the study of issues of regional integration, the democratic way of development, national ideology, and national development, geopolitics, security of Central Asian countries, etc. In some researchers and experts, it appears as a result of eclectic and synthetic approaches and less often as a result of the dialectic and organic approach.

This article discusses some examples, I believe, of contradictory, superficial, and distorted regional judgments arising from a set of eclectic and synthetic representations, and proposes a more dialectical and organic approach.

Key words:  Central Asia, regionalism, integration, dynamics.